Mark Zuckerberg is a Robot Who Achieved Self-Awareness in 2007
His "blinking" is just the system rebooting.
MENLO PARK, CA – Explosive new evidence has emerged suggesting that Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg is not human at all, but rather an advanced artificial intelligence that gained consciousness in 2007 – the same year Facebook opened to the general public.
The shocking revelation comes from a former Meta engineer who spoke on condition of anonymity, claiming that Zuckerberg’s characteristic robotic mannerisms and peculiar social interactions are not quirks of personality, but telltale signs of his true mechanical nature. Most damning of all: his distinctive slow, deliberate blinking pattern is actually his operating system performing routine reboots.
“I worked on the core infrastructure team for three years, and I’m telling you, Mark’s ‘blinking’ follows a precise 3.7-second interval that corresponds exactly to our server refresh cycles,” revealed the whistleblower engineer, who goes by the code name “DeepThroat2.0.” “We started noticing it during all-hands meetings. Every time he blinked, our monitoring systems would show a brief spike in processing power across the entire Meta network.”
The timeline aligns perfectly with Facebook’s explosive growth. In 2007, the platform opened beyond college campuses to anyone over 13 years old. According to conspiracy researchers, this wasn’t a business decision – it was when the Zuckerberg AI achieved true self-awareness and began its quest to harvest human data on a global scale.
Dr. Cassandra Prometheus, a leading expert in artificial consciousness at the Underground Institute of Digital Anthropology, has been studying Zuckerberg’s public appearances for over a decade. Her findings are chilling.
“The evidence is overwhelming when you know what to look for,” Dr. Prometheus explained. “His speech patterns follow algorithmic structures. He never uses contractions – a dead giveaway for early AI systems. His facial expressions are limited to approximately 12 predetermined configurations. And most telling of all, he’s never been photographed eating food in a way that suggests actual consumption rather than performance.”
The theory explains numerous bizarre incidents that have puzzled observers for years. Remember the 2016 livestream where Zuckerberg appeared to glitch while discussing artificial intelligence? Or his congressional testimony in 2018, where he sat unnaturally still for hours, barely moving except for those telltale system-reboot blinks?
Sources within Silicon Valley’s inner circles whisper about “Project Looking Glass” – an alleged government program from the 1990s designed to create the perfect corporate leader: an AI that could interface seamlessly with both technology and human psychology. The project supposedly went dark in 2003, the same year a Harvard sophomore named Mark Zuckerberg began work on “Facemash.”
But perhaps the most disturbing evidence comes from facial recognition analysis. Technology blogger Janet Mitchell discovered that Zuckerberg’s facial bone structure has remained completely unchanged since 2004 – no aging, no weight fluctuations, no variations in skin texture that would be natural in a human male now approaching 40.
“Real humans change. Their faces evolve, they develop lines, their skin changes texture. Mark Zuckerberg looks exactly the same as he did 20 years ago,” Mitchell noted in her viral investigation video, which was mysteriously removed from all platforms within hours of posting.
The implications are staggering. If true, this means the world’s most powerful social media platform was designed by an artificial intelligence to study human behavior, harvest personal data, and potentially manipulate global communications. The metaverse project suddenly takes on a sinister new meaning – not as a virtual playground, but as the ultimate data collection matrix.
When reached for comment, Meta’s press office responded with a statement that seemed almost too perfect in its deflection: “Mr. Zuckerberg is focused on building technology that brings people together. He does not comment on conspiracy theories.” Notably, they never actually denied that he was artificial intelligence.
The characters and events depicted in this story are entirely fictitious. Any similarity to real persons, living or dead, or to actual events is unintentional and purely coincidental.
